Towards a non-defensive faith

In a recent conversation with me, Jim Longley contrasted the Anabaptist approach to theology and ethics to what he labelled the “defensive” approach adopted by much of the church. My experience of Christianity supports that categorisation. The institutional church, especially the Evangelical variety, and many individuals hold a position that is profoundly defensive. It is…

Continue Reading

Sex and Social Justice

I stumbled across an article from 2008 by Bruce Wydick titled “Sex and Social Justice“. Although he makes a reasonably good case for the Christian ideal of sex within marriage, a key part of his case simply doesn’t match my personal experience. From his perspective as an economist, Wydick considers the act of sex as…

Continue Reading

contra Singer

John Wyatt presented a neat introduction to Peter Singer’s moral philosophy on Hope 103.2 Open House recently. He summarises the foundation of Singer’s ethics thus: Instead of treating all human life as equal, recognise that the worth of human life varies.  Value depends on an ability to choose. Take responsibility for the consequences of your…

Continue Reading

Stephen Clarke on Conservatives and Liberals

Stephen Clarke proposes a neat distinction between Conservative and Liberal attitudes towards morality on the ABC’s Philosopher’s Zone. Liberals place high moral value on: Individual freedom/autonomy Fairness, equal opportunity Conservatives, while still holding to the above, place greater moral value on: Respect for authority Respect for sanctity / purity => typically some religious system Protecting…

Continue Reading

Mark Rowlands on morality

Mark Rowlands talks about morality on the ABC’s Philosopher’s Zone (that site includes a complete transcript). Putting aside what seem to me irrelevant comments about his pet wolf, Rowlands introduces some basic concepts about morality very neatly: If you construe human morality on the basis of implicit contracts then at its base morality is about:…

Continue Reading